About the Journal

Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Focus

More than 60% of the experiments fail to produce results or expected discoveries. This high percentage of negative information generates high level pieces of knowledge. But generally, all these experiments have not been published anywhere as they have been considered useless for our research target. The objective of “The All Results Journal focuses on recovering and publishing negative results in Chemistry, Biology and Biomedicine, Physics and Nanotech. These key experiments are vital for the complete development of science. These negative results are the catalyst for a real science-based empirical knowledge.

The All Results Journal is an online journal that publishes research articles after an exhaustive peer review. All articles will be published, without any barriers to access, immediately upon acceptance.

The experiments will have to be rigorously conducted and repeatable. To that end, every single submitted work should have a discussion section in which a reasonable explanation concerning the reasons why certain results have appeared. Submitted papers for the journal will be peer reviewed by experts in the corresponding field.

Scope

The journal will cover those experiments with negative (or “secondary”) results coming from all disciplines of Chemistry (Analitical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Physical-Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, etc), Biology (Botany, Cell Biology, Genetics, Ecology, Microbiology, etc), Nanotechnology and Physics (Acoustics, Astronomy, Biophysics, Cosmology, Electromagnetism, Mechanics, Nuclear physics, etc.). An article in The All Results Journal should be created to show the failed experiments tuning methods or reactions. Articles should present experimental discoveries, interpret their significance and establish perspective with earlier work of the author. It is also advisable to cite the work where the experiments has already been tuned and published (if any).

Section Policies

Editorial

Editors

  • Prof. David Diaz Diaz
    • David Alcantara
◻️Open Submissions      ✔️Indexed      ✔️Peer Reviewed

Articles

Editors

  • Prof. David Diaz Diaz
    • David Alcantara

✔️Open Submissions      ✔️Indexed      ✔️Peer Reviewed

Reviews

Editors

  • Prof. David Diaz Diaz 
✔️Open Submissions      ✔️Indexed      ✔️Peer Reviewed

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

Reviewer Recruitment

The All Results Journal covers the negative results in Chemistry, Biology, Nanotechnology and Physics. The full editorial board welcomes you to join us to be Reviewer.

Status: Part time                              Working language: English

Working style: Internet-based          Payment: Voluntary job, no payment

Description

Participation in the peer-review process is absolutely essential to the success and reputation of the journal. Reviewers along with the editors determine which work is of quality and significance. Due to extensive readership, the research and scholarship presented will ultimately have an impact on literacy in classrooms, nationally and internationally.

Reviewer's name will be listed in the on the journal's webpage.

Requirements

a). possess a doctoral degree in the specific subject related closely to the journal;
b). hold a job at a university or academic organization, in a teaching or research position;
c). be fluent in academic and professional English;
d). have a strong interest in scholarly journal;
e). work quickly and accurately to tight deadlines.

How to apply

1. Complete application form download here.
2. Send your application form to the journal's E-mail address:  ddiaz@arjournals.com

Corrections and Retraction Policy

Article Withdrawal

Some authors request withdrawal of manuscript after submission. If the withdrawal is done within the time span when the article is with the Editor, and for a genuine reason, author is allowed the withdraw the manuscript without any penalty. If the author withdraws a manuscript any time after the manuscript has been sent to peer review till the final decision, then unless there are compelling reasons, the request is not entertained without an penalty. This penalty will be in form of payment to the journal for its time and resources spent and it is set at 50Euros per article. Articles can be withdrawn by either by the authors or the publishers. If the authors request withdrawal of an article, a signed statement from all the authors will be required to be submitted to the Editorial Office (or the Editor of the manuscript) before an article can be withdrawn. If an article is found to violate the ethical publishing guidelines of the journal such as duplicate publication, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data, multiple submission or bogus claims of authorship, the article will be withdrawn by the publisher. In such case the article content will be removed from the HTML and PDF version of the Early View article and replaced by a note that the article has been withdrawn.

Article Corrections

If any error is discovered in a paper after publication, corrections (Erratum, Corrigendum, Addendum) will be published in the next issue or as soon as the publisher and author, both agree to the proposed changes. The corrections will be published only if a significant error is found in the paper like factually inaccurate published information. Minor corrections which do not significantly affect the content and understanding of the paper like spelling mistakes and grammatical errors will not be published.

When a correction is published it will be linked to the article being corrected and a link to the corrections page will also be placed on the article published earlier. The correction will also be added to the PDF version of the article. No changes or modification will be made to the original content of the article PDF. This will enable the readers to download the article and the amendment together. The original published version of the article, in HTML and PDF, format will be preserved in journal archives to maintain the integrity of the published record.

Errata is published when mistakes are introduced or not recognized in the article during editing or production, like significant typographical errors, errors in figure or table numbers or their legends, proof corrections submitted but not included in the article during editing, wrong details in the address or email of the author.

Corrigenda is published when errors are detected by the authors after publication of the paper which compromises the validity of the scientific content, its accuracy and reproducibility. If the readers detect an error in any paper, they are requested to submit their comments as 'Letter to the Editor' following the prescribed article format. These articles submitted as 'Letter to the editor' will be peer reviewed and will also be sent to original authors for their comments. On acceptance for publication, the 'Letter to the editor' and comments of the original authors will be published in the same issue.

Addenda are published if the authors inadvertently omitted any significant information at the time of submitting the manuscript and want to add this content to the article after it has been published. All information submitted as addendum will be peer reviewed before editorial acceptance. Addenda will be published only in rare circumstances when it is decided by the editors that the information in the addendum is essential to understand a significant part of the published article.

Article Retractions

Retractions are published in circumstances like, if the conclusions of a paper is found to be based on faulty logic or computation by new information made available after the paper has been published; if the paper is based on falsified or fabricated data, if plagiarized data has been published or if duplicate publications exist. The retractions are decided on a case by case basis by the editor in consultation with the authors and the reviewers of the article. A signed statement from the authors will be required to be submitted to the Editorial Office before an article can be retracted. Agreement of all authors of a paper is required before a retraction can be published. If some co-authors do not agree to the retraction of the article, the retraction will be published as decided by the editor, clearly identifying the dissenting co-authors. When a retraction is published it will be linked to the article being corrected and a link to the retractions page will also be placed on the article published earlier. On the webpages of the retracted article the bibliographic information will be retained on all the pages, however, the article text will be replaced by a note stating that the article has been retracted from the journal. The PDF version of the article will be retained to preserve the integrity of record, but will be marked to show that the article has been retracted. In cases of partial retractions, the retraction notice will be labeled as 'Partial Retraction' or 'Retraction in Part'.

Article Removal

In exceptional circumstances an article may be removed from the journal. This may happen if any legal issues arise or are expected to arise in context of the article, the distribution of the article is stopped by an court order, the contents of the article may pose a serious health risk if acted upon by others, the article violates copyright of others, or if the article is found to be defamatory or infringing on other's legal rights. When an article is removed from the journal the bibliographic information will be retained on all the pages and the PDF file, however, the article text will be replaced by a note stating that the article has been removed from the journal and the reason for removal.

Article Replacement

If an article is found to contain false or inaccurate data which may pose a serious health risk if acted upon by others, the authors of the original article may wish to retract the article and replace it with a corrected version. In this case, the article will be retracted, following the procedure of retraction of an article, with the difference that a link to the corrected re-published article will be placed on the HTML and PDF versions of the paper and on the page with the retraction notice.

Ensuring a Blind Peer Review

To ensure the integrity of the blind peer-review for submission to this journal, every effort should be made to prevent the identities of the authors and reviewers from being known to each other. This involves the authors, editors, and reviewers (who upload documents as part of their review) checking to see if the following steps have been taken with regard to the text and the file properties:

  1. The authors of the document have deleted their names from the text, with "Author" and year used in the references and footnotes, instead of the authors' name, article title, etc.

  2. With Microsoft Office documents, author identification should also be removed from the properties for the file.

    For Microsoft 2003 and previous versions, and Macintosh versions of Word:

    • Under the File menu select: Save As > Tools (or Options with a Mac) > Security > Remove personal information from file properties on save > Save.

    For MacIntosh Word 2008 (and future versions)

    1. Under the File menu select "Properties."
    2. Under the Summary tab remove all of the identifying information from all of the fields.
    3. Save the File.

    For Microsoft 2007 (Windows):

    1. Click on the office button in the upper-left hand corner of the office application
    2. Select "Prepare" from the menu options.
    3. Select "Properties" for the "Prepare" menu options.
    4. Delete all of the information in the document property fields that appear under the main menu options.
    5. Save the document and close the document property field section.

    For Microsoft 2010 (Windows):

    1. Under the File menu select "Prepare for sharing."
    2. Click on the "Check for issues" icon.
    3. click on "inspect document" icon.
    4. Uncheck all of the checkboxes except "Document Properties and Personal information".
    5. Run the document inspector, which will then do a search of the document properties and indicated if any document property fields contain any information.
    6. If the document inspector finds that some of the document properties contain information it will notify you and give you the option to "Remove all," which you will click to remove the document properties and personal information from the document.

  3. For PDF files:

    • With PDFs, the authors' names should also be removed from Document Properties found under File on Adobe Acrobat's main menu.

Journal Sponsorship

Publisher

Society for the Improvement of Science

Sponsors

The All Results Journals are published by the Society for the Improvement of Science (SACSIS), a non-profit scientific organization founded to promote scientific research and technological innovation at the highest levels. SACSIS general purpose is to prevent the editorial bias that are suffering the negative results of main scientific research. Optimization of research infrastructure will translate in a better society in a faster way.

 

Other